[christianw.]

For reference, my additional input to Matthew,

Zitat:Dear Matthew,

additional to the mail from today,

i now have changed the faulty ic on a different testboard, which failed without having the capacitive pull-up at no time.

Testing the signals on this chip gives excellent boot-up-performance with just showing a nice log-function caused by the bulk-capacity. /SHDN is also without any problems.

So i guess, the IC i mentioned before is in a stage of pre-fail.

As i say first, the faulty chip never had this C13 between VDD and /SHDN.

The failed IC marks:

ETJ 102
NNHH3GT


The "strange" IC we talked before marks:

ETJ 105
NNHH3GT


The replacement IC marks:

ETJ 015
NNHH3GT


Kindly regards,


Christian W.